Site 06

From Beaver Run Project
Jump to: navigation, search

This is a summary report of all field data and lab results for surface bottle site 06.

See How To Read A Field Data Report and/or How To Read A Lab Analysis Report for more detailed information about the tables below.

Field Data Summary Report

Below is a field data summary report for this site, including the average and standard deviation values for each measured parameter. Collector initials are explained here.

Date Collector Time pH TDS (ppm) Cond. (µS) Temp. (C°) Comments
2011/06 JW 9:00 3.10 734 1470 13.6 AMD[1]
2011/09 JW 8:38 4.07 471 942 19.7 AMD[1]
2011/12 RC, JW 4.83 379 755 water is less red than previous samples
2012/03 JW, AH 8:30 4.10 419 844 5.1 AMD[1]
2012/06 AH, AS, SD, BO 11:36 3.40 671 1344 17.6 moderate flow, AMD[1]
2012/09 AH, AT 10:15 3.41 519 1177 14.1 AMD[1]
2012/12 AH, AS 10:50 5.32 218 434 9.2 moderate flow
2013/03 AH, JK 16:15 4.97 463 927 9.3 AMD[1]
2013/06 AH, JV, DT 10:30 4.68 414 831 AMD[1]
2013/09 AH, KS 10:30 5.17 388 765 14.3 white foam, acid mine drainage
2013/12 DT,BF 14:32 4.17 443 892 3.5 none
2014/03 JK, ET, DT, BO 10:17 3.37 510 1030 5.6 moderate flow; AMD[1]
2014/06 TH, DT 14:00 3.12 552 1106 21.3 moderate flow
2014/09 TH, JK 15:25 3.72 522 1040 19.5 none
2014/12 TH, JK, BFo, GM 13:12 5.04 439 882 2.1 none
2015/03 BO, BFo, PM 11:00 3.00 512 1025 2.1 high flow
2015/06 TH, BFo 13:26 4.98 208 415 16.4 high flow
2015/09 TH, BFo 11:16 3.50 522 1045 16.0 moderate flow, reddish color on rocks
2015/12 BFo, NH, MG 11:10 4.70 423 847 9.6 moderate flow
2016/03 BO, NH, SJ, MH 11:06 3.40 485 967 7.4 moderately high flow
2016/06 NH, JC 11:00 3.74 418 835 18.4 none
2016/09 NH, KL, GO 11:43 3.63 521 1041 19.8 low flow
Average values 4.06 ± 0.76 465 ± 117 937 ± 241 12.2 ± 6.4

Metal Concentrations

The following samples were analyzed for various metals. All results are reported in units of parts per million (ppm). Any result that was below the instrument detection limit is designated by '<LD', and any result that was detectable but not quantifiable (e.g., lower than the limit of quantitation) is designated by 'DNQ'.

Date Ca Mg Fe Mn Al[2] Sr Pb As Hg Cr Ba Cd
2011/06 90.3 5.6 12.91 6.295 0.206 <LD <LD <LD <LD 0.013 <LD
2011/09 90.9 26.4 0.41 4.627 0.240 <LD <LD <LD <LD 0.035 <LD
2011/12 73.2 22.0 2.61 3.564 0.174 <LD <LD <LD <LD 0.014 <LD
2012/03 78.8 25.7 4.14 3.976 0.186 <LD <LD <LD <LD 0.025 <LD
2012/06 112.5 40.7 9.21 6.640 0.265 <LD <LD <LD DNQ <LD <LD
2012/09 117.2 36.7 2.67 6.757 0.278 <LD <LD <LD DNQ 0.010 <LD
2012/12 44.6 11.7 0.63 1.705 0.120 <LD <LD <LD <LD 0.013 <LD
2013/03 75.5 27.0 4.88 4.045 0.183 <LD <LD <LD DNQ 0.022 <LD
2013/06 80.4 23.8 2.10 3.794 0.203 <LD <LD <LD <LD 0.025 <LD
2013/09 76.0 22.5 1.03 3.968 0.191 <LD <LD <LD 0.002 0.042 <LD
2013/12 78.9 26.0 4.99 4.117 0.189 <LD <LD <LD 0.006 0.030 <LD
2014/03 87.1 30.9 8.25 4.750 0.201 <LD <LD <LD 0.009 0.026 <LD
2014/06 95.0 32.0 3.86 6.424 17.59 0.237 <LD <LD <LD 0.006 0.032 <LD
2014/09 110.0 35.0 1.39 8.235 13.82 0.275 <LD <LD <LD 0.004 0.033 <LD
2014/12 88.6 24.3 5.27 3.975 11.90 0.215 <LD <LD <LD <LD 0.034 <LD
2015/03 73.6 28.0 5.15 4.394 18.73 0.166 <LD <LD <LD 0.004 0.018 <LD
2015/06 40.8 13.3 2.91 1.855 7.03 0.105 <LD <LD <LD 0.003 0.041 <LD
2015/09 99.6 29.8 1.33 5.874 11.27 0.257 <LD <LD <LD DNQ 0.038 <LD
2015/12 98.2 27.3 0.47 4.505 8.30 0.235 <LD <LD <LD <LD 0.038 <LD
2016/03 87.0 30.2 6.37 4.749 19.95 0.192 <LD <LD <LD DNQ 0.038 <LD
2016/06 93.4 28.1 1.35 4.702 12.68 0.222 <LD <LD <LD 0.021 0.035 <LD
2016/09 106.2 32.0 0.86 6.132 11.72 0.266 <LD <LD <LD <LD <LD <LD
Avg. ± std.dev. 86 ± 19 26 ± 8 3.8 ± 3.2 4.8 ± 1.6 13 ± 4 0.209 ± 0.046 0.007 ± 0.006 0.028 ± 0.010

TDS, Alkalinity, and Salt Concentrations

The following samples were analyzed for total dissolved solids (TDS), alkalinity, and various [[Salts Analysis|anionic salts. All results are reported in units of parts per million (ppm). Any result that was below the instrument detection limit is designated by '<LD', and any result that was detectable but not quantifiable (e.g., lower than the limit of quantitation) is designated by 'DNQ'.

Date TDS Alk.[3] F Cl Br NO3 PO4 SO4
2011/06 1123 acidic[4] 0.22 0.72 0.245 0.46 0.31 56.55
2011/09 717 acidic[4] 0.08 66.31 0.304 1.96 0.47 409.36
2011/12 596 0.05 24.93 0.260 3.32 0.51 360.50
2012/03 646 acidic[4] 0.08 33.56 0.236 1.74 0.55 401.72
2012/06 1096 acidic[4] 0.25 48.41 0.223 0.98 <LD 702.24
2012/09 1181 acidic[4] 0.50 20.05 0.090 1.19 <LD 1044.00
2012/12 424 acidic[4] 0.52 36.64 0.128 2.87 <LD 273.06
2013/03 695 acidic[4] 0.98 64.80 0.153 1.52 <LD 637.57
2013/06 691 acidic[4] 0.88 58.61 0.075 1.14 <LD 592.14
2013/09 596 1.48 0.87 58.29 0.038 1.64 <LD 587.14
2013/12 665 acidic[4] 0.97 67.28 0.050 1.96 1.30 756.20
2014/03 770 acidic[4] 1.13 58.44 0.044 1.13 <LD 840.54
2014/06 780 acidic[4] 1.14 51.31 0.037 0.91 1.15 848.55
2014/09 1002 acidic[4] 1.20 61.96 0.077 0.93 <LD 795.97
2014/12 578 1.48 0.82 89.10 0.058 1.61 <LD 575.38
2015/03 658 acidic[4] 1.08 74.26 0.047 1.58 <LD 742.68
2015/06 342 acidic[4] 0.61 30.40 0.039 -0.13 <LD 309.39
2015/09 672 acidic[4] 0.92 78.89 0.060 1.86 <LD 860.30
2015/12 653 1.08 1.04 70.68 0.049 1.51 <LD 624.77
2016/03 750 acidic[4] 1.36 45.24 0.053 1.60 <LD 769.09
2016/06 788 acidic[4] 0.90 58.77 0.077 1.41 <LD 562.85
2016/09 867 acidic[4] 1.16 63.69 0.079 1.47 1.39 676.43
Avg. ± std.dev. 740 ± 210 1 ± 0 0.76 ± 0.41 53 ± 21 0.11 ± 0.09 1.5 ± 0.7 0.81 ± 0.45 610 ± 232

Notes

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 Sites denoted with "AMD" are affected by abandoned (or acid) mine drainage.
  2. Samples were not analyzed for aluminum prior to June 2014.
  3. Alkalinity is reported as ppm CaCO3 equivalents.
  4. 4.00 4.01 4.02 4.03 4.04 4.05 4.06 4.07 4.08 4.09 4.10 4.11 4.12 4.13 4.14 4.15 4.16 4.17 Samples labeled "acidic" for the alkalinity test were already at a pH 4.5 and could not be titrated.



HomeQuarterly Field ReportsQuarterly Lab ReportsBottle Sites